Hmmmm...I couldn't help thinking how well this article dovetails with my recent post on Tammy Grimes. So, the government seized these children from their parents because they believed they should have life-saving medical treatment which the parents would not provide. So, they ignored the parents' religious beliefs and parental wishes, went into their HOME and took their children away from them. And nobody arrested the government. In fact, many people probably strongly support the government's attempt to provide blood transfusions to the sickly children though it does not fit with the religious beliefs of the parents.
How is it different when somebody sees an animal in distress and wants to provide the same life-saving care? How are they criminals whereas the government was acting in good faith? Does not compute.
Comments